The Los Angeles Police Department encourages the public to spy on neighbors and file suspicious activity reports about innocent (non-criminal) activities that seem out of place through its "iWatch" program. A new report by Political Research Associates, called "Platform for Prejudice", explains how such programs practically invite racial, ethnic, and religious profiling that not only harms individuals who get singled out on the basis of personal characteristics, but is ultimately counter-productive in terms of combatting terrorism. Elements of this program violate existing rules on domestic intelligence collection because tips need not relate to a crime, but can be something that simply "raises suspicion."
Neighbors as Spies: Public Reporting Through iWATCH
In an April 2010 article in Emergency Management, public information director for the LAPD Mary Grady discusses how the iWatch program will be expanded in April 2010 by translating literature and public service announcements into Spanish, Korean, Vietnamese, and Mandarin. According to Grady, the iWatch program has generated several dozen reports from the public so far. It is unclear whether individuals named in such reports are adequately protected from false reports.
iWATCH, a civilian program launched by the LAPD in October 2009, supplements LAPD Special Order No. 11, which charges police officers with reporting suspicious behaviors that might be indicative of terrorism, including innocent and Constitutionally-protected activities like "taking pictures with no aesthetic value," "espousing extremist views," and "taking notes or making diagrams."
“Law enforcement cannot be everywhere and see everything,” notes the LAPD’s blog, “iWATCH adds another tool to assist an agency’s predictive and analytical capability by educating community members about specific behaviors and activities that they should report.”
iWATCH was developed under the direction of LAPD Commander McNamara, and can be used in any community anywhere in the United States. Miami and Boston have similar See Something, Say Something campaigns. iWATCH lists nine types of suspicious behavior the public should look for, assuring tipsters, “this service is truly anonymous.” William Bratton described iWATCH as “the 21st century version of Neighborhood Watch.” In an NPR interview, Bratton provided this rationale:
Any street cop will tell you that crime prevention occurs best at the local level and terrorist-related crime prevention is no different. The problem has always been that individuals have varying thresholds at which they feel compelled to notify authorities when the activity is not overtly terrorist related. The iWATCH program is a giant leap toward overcoming this problem and literally provides millions of new eyes and ears in the terrorism prevention effort.
iWATCH, then, encourages the public to file a report even if people are not convinced that witnessed behavior is criminal. “Let the experts decide,” cajoles a creepy Public Service Announcement.
In this interview, Former Chief Bratton appeared dismissive of concerns that iWATCH would invite racial profiling, saying, “No, I think we’re a more mature society than that.” (query: was the LAPD Rampart Division simple being immature when it generated one of the largest scandals involving documented police misconduct, including convictions of police officers for unprovoked shootings and beatings, planting of evidence, framing suspects, perjury, and subsequent cover-ups in the late 1990s?)
iWATCH is disturbingly similar to the controversial TIPS (Terrorist Information and Prevention System), an initiative created by the Bush administration to recruit one million volunteers in 10 cities across the country. TIPS encouraged volunteers to report suspicious activity that might be terrorism-related. TIPS came under intense criticism by various news media outlets in July 2002 for providing the United States with a higher percentage of citizen spies. According to an editorial in the Washington Post:
Americans should not be subjecting themselves to law enforcement scrutiny merely by having cable lines installed, mail delivered or meters read. Police cannot routinely enter people’s houses without either permission or a warrant. They should not be using utility workers to conduct surveillance they could not lawfully conduct themselves.
TIPS was officially canceled in 2002 when Congress enacted the Homeland Security Act. However, iWATCH seems to be virtually identical to the failed TIPS program. Residents and store owners should report incidents that demonstrate reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, such as purchasing large amounts of explosive chemicals. But the language of iWatch -- encouraging untrained people to report vague occurrences that "just don't seem right" -- invites people to act on racialized stereotypes of who is a terrorist. iWatch deserves to meet the same fate as TIPS. Collecting more information of a lower quality does not help intelligence analysts "connect the dots." It is a recipe for clogging the system with biased data, while simultaneously alienating communities and eroding trust.
___________________________
To read more of PRA's analysis of suspicious activity reporting programs, download a copy of PRA's new report on the nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative here.